Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Jurnal Logistik Bisnis (p-ISSN: 2086-8561) enforces a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review policy. In this process, both the reviewers' and authors' identities are kept anonymous throughout the review to ensure objective, unbiased, and high-quality academic evaluations.
Review Workflow Steps
- Initial Desk Review (Screening):
Upon submission, the Managing Editor conducts an initial evaluation to check for:- Scope alignment with Jurnal Logistik Bisnis.
- Compliance with the official article template.
- Similarity index check via Turnitin/iThenticate (maximum allowed threshold is 20%).
- Anonymization & Assignment:
Manuscripts that pass desk review are anonymized (removal of author names, affiliations, and explicit self-citations) and assigned to at least two independent peer reviewers with relevant subject matter expertise. - Peer Review Evaluation:
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript within 4 to 8 weeks based on:- Originality and scientific contribution to logistics/supply chain management.
- Methodological rigor, mathematical accuracy, and data validity.
- Clarity of discussion, logical structure, and practical/managerial implications.
- Quality and recency of references (APA 7th style).
- Editorial Decision:
Based on the reviewers' reports, the Editor-in-Chief / Managing Editor makes one of the following final decisions:- Accept Submission: The manuscript is accepted as is for publication.
- Revisions Required (Minor): The author must address minor feedback within 1–2 weeks.
- Resubmit for Review (Major): Substantial structural or methodological revisions are needed, followed by a second round of review.
- Decline Submission: The manuscript is rejected due to critical technical or conceptual flaws.
- Revision & Final Production:
Authors must submit their revised manuscript along with a point-by-point Response to Reviewers document. Once approved by the editor, the paper proceeds to copyediting, layout formatting, DOI registration, and publication.
DOWNLOAD ARTICLE TEMPLATE
